• Aircrafts rely on GNSS/PNT for navigation, approach, and landing. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) ensures these systems meet safety-critical thresholds. For a GNSS signal to be certified for Performance-Based Navigation (PBN), it must meet ICAO’s integrity, availability, accuracy, and continuity standards. Downstream role: Ensures PNT systems are usable in commercial and civil aviation operations globally. https://www.icao.int/Meetings/PBN-Symposium/Documents/9849_cons_en[1].pdf
• Ships use GNSS for navigation, collision avoidance, and search-and-rescue operations. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) sets standards for e-Navigation, where PNT systems feed into integrated bridge systems and automatic identification systems (AIS). Downstream role: Enables safe and efficient sea travel and port operations. https://insidegnss.com/imo-and-the-gnss/ https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/icg/2023/ICG-17/icg17.02.21.pdf
• The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) manages the spectrum and orbital slots needed for PNT signal transmission and ensures signals don’t interfere with others (e.g., telecom, broadcasting, weather). https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/Documents/FAQs%20on%20GNSS%20Interference.pdf
Prerequisites:
• Institutional & political interest and support for utilising PNT technologies for services
• Understand national
policies and identify national policies that utilise PNT data
• Identify and build relationships with stakeholders involved in policy implementation
• Access to PNT data, data processing and analysis capabilities
• Spectrum policy & coordination with telecom regulator; ITU procedures where applicable
• Inter-ministerial working group
• Contacts with ICAO, IMO, ITU or regional counterparts
Cost:
• Ballpark: USD 100k–400k
• Includes: technical gap assessment against ICAO/IMO/ITU standards, inter-ministerial coordination and regulatory review, participation in international working groups and expert committees, legal and compliance audits, workshops and training for regulators and operators, documentation and reporting
Timeframe:
• Overall: 12–24 mo
• Phase: scoping & stakeholder mapping (2–3 mo), technical/legal gap analysis (4–6 mo), consultations & standards drafting (4–6 mo), international engagement & alignment (6–9 mo), final validation & adoption (2–3 mo)
Pros:
• Global interoperability - Ensures national PNT services can be used in international aviation, maritime, and telecom operations without restrictions.
• Safety and trust - Signal certification and compliance with ICAO/IMO/ITU increases reliability and confidence for regulated sectors.
• Market access - Compliance opens access to international aviation and shipping markets that require certified navigation systems.
• Regulatory credibility - Positions the nation as a responsible actor aligned with global norms, reducing political and operational risk.
• Downstream growth - Enables domestic industries (aviation, maritime, telecom) to integrate PNT seamlessly, stimulating economic benefits.
Considerations:
• High compliance burden - Requires continuous engagement with ICAO/IMO/ITU processes, technical reporting, and auditing.
• Cost of certification - Achieving and maintaining compliance can require specialised expertise and recurring certification costs.
• Reduced autonomy - Adapting to international standards may limit flexibility to define purely national technical specifications.
• Capacity requirements - Needs skilled regulatory, legal, and technical staff to engage effectively in international standardisation processes.
• Long timelines - Standardisation and certification processes with ICAO/IMO/ITU can take years, slowing deployment.