Our goal is to define the principles required to protect the global financial system amidst rising geopolitical complexity

The initiative assesses the qualitative and quantitative risks of violating these principles by sizing the potential costs in economic and financial market terms, and engages with various stakeholders.

$6.9tn

Potential cost to the world economy of fragmentation

$213b - $307b

Current cost of fragmentation to the world economy

13%

Decline in the dollar share of global reserves since 1999

80%

Of major economies in recent OECD report which have implemented investment screening 

Why does the Navigating Global Financial System Fragmentation initiative matter?

Countries are increasingly deploying geo-economic statecraft measures and attempting to bolster domestic resilience, exacerbating geopolitical tensions and fragmentation.

Deployment of geo-economic statecraft measures

Ongoing geopolitical conflicts have caused disruptions throughout the global financial system and could create further turbulence as states engage in geo-economic statecraft, the use of economic and financial tools to advance foreign policy priorities.

Pursuit of economic resilience

Global disruptions like COVID-19 supply chain breakages and climate change have led states to pursue a dual strategy to bolster domestic resiliency: strengthen domestic production capacities and reduce reliance on global supply chains.

Timeline

Key events mark the evolution of the global financial system over time.

2025 - 2026

Turning Point in the Global Financial System

US imposes sweeping tariffs worldwide including on allies; China retaliates with tariffs over 100%, first-of-their-kind export controls on rare earths, and tighter restrictions on Chinese US listings;  War in Iran drives a sharp rise in oil and commodity prices


Early 2020s

Fragmentation accelerates

UK formally withdraws from the EU; COVID-19 spurs supply chain restructuring in push for resilience; US and EU expand sanctions on Russia following invasion of Ukraine; ongoing tariff escalation


2010s

Fragmentation pressures 

China announces Belt and Road Initiative; US and EU sanction Russia following occupation of Crimea and eastern Ukraine; Brexit referendum and resulting negotiations; initiation of US-China trade conflict


2000s

Continued integration and crisis

China joins WTO; US uses financial system as counter-terrorism tool after 9/11; global financial crisis halts rapid financial sector expansion; Financial Stability Board created;  Basel III developed


1990s

Financial globalization and new technologies

Collapse of the USSR; broader adoption of real-time settlement systems; establishment of the WTO; introduction of the Euro; rise of internet-based finance and electronic trading platforms


1980s

Global deregulation and integration

Easing of foreign exchange controls; expansion of derivatives markets; EMDEs increasingly shift from import-substitution approach toward export-led growth strategies


1970s

Foundation of the modern global financial system

  End of Bretton Woods system delinks USD and gold; oil crises create turbulence and reinforce USD dominance; institutional changes at the Federal Reserve begin long-term disinflation


Macroeconomic impact

Our analysis uses four scenarios to quantify the potential impact of financial system fragmentation on different blocs of countries (East, West, and Neutrals) and on the world as a whole. We find that fragmentation is currently having a negative impact on the global economy of between $213 billion and $307 billion, and could have a negative impact on the global economy of up to $6.9 trillion in the worst-case scenario, greater than the impact of the Great Recession or the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Scenario 1: 

Existing Fragmentation

The economic cost of current trade and financial policies. Assumes a global 15% Section 122 tariff rate to reflect signalling from the US.

Scenario 2: 

Moderate Fragmentation

Modest escalation in global restrictions, including a higher degree of retaliation by countries against the US.

Scenario 3:

High Fragmentation

Escalation in East–West tensions. Neutrals continue to have ties to both sides, but partially align with the bloc of their largest trading partner.

Scenario 4: 

Very High Fragmentation

Division of the world into two fully severed blocs, with Neutrals forced to choose a bloc

Impact on financial institutions

Fragmentation could impact private financial institutions across a broad range of risk categories.










How to engage

The initiative has two governance bodies through which Forum partners engage.

Steering Committee

Select World Economic Forum partner organization chief executives and chairpersons are invited to the Steering Committee to shape the initiative's agenda and offer strategic guidance.

Working Group

Steering Committee members are encouraged to nominate a representative to join the initiative’s Working Group, which executes and delivers on the vision and strategy of the Steering Committee.          

An initiative of the Centre for Financial and Monetary Systems


The Centre for Financial and Monetary Systems is designing and developing a financial system that effectively allocates capital and investment in support of planet, people, and communities.